Summary of Agricultural Reserve Survey
June/July 2014
Back to Agricultural Reserve Workshops
The Planning Division posted a survey regarding the Agricultural Reserve in
June 2014. Links to the survey were provided from the Planning Division/PZB and
Palm Beach County websites. In addition, the Planning Division mailed a request
to complete the survey to each non-residential property owner of record in the
Agricultural Reserve, and to any occupant of these properties where different
than the owner. A request was also sent to every homeowners' association in the
Agricultural Reserve, identified through Florida Department of State mandatory
registry, as well as to numerous individuals and entities who had previously
been identified as interested parties for the Agricultural Reserve.
In
total, more than 800 requests to complete the survey were mailed. Two-hundred
twenty-three survey responses were logged; these were reduced to 215 once some
duplicate entries and staff/test entries were removed.
The following
statistics summarize the results received:
Respondent's Area of Interest: | Responses |
Community Organization Representative | 12 |
Developer/Agent | 3 |
Equestrian | 20 |
Farmer | 6 |
Interested Citizen (not Ag Reserve Resident) | 48 |
Representative/owner of Non-Residential | 20 |
Nursery Operator | 26 |
Resident (Planned Development) | 33 |
Resident (not Planned Development) | 27 |
Wholesale Agricultural Consumer | 3 |
Other or not provided | 17 |
TOTAL | 215 |
Using all the information provided in the survey responses (respondent's
selected interest, address, etc.), the following participation was determined:
Home or Business Interest in Ag Reserve | Responses |
Yes | 105 |
No | 105 |
Undetermined | 5 |
TOTAL | 215 |
Respondents were asked to provide comments regarding the most important
issues or problems to be addressed in the Agricultural Reserve, as well as
potential opportunities or solutions. Comments provided could generally be
characterized as supporting the continued limitation on development options, or
supporting the expansion of development options in the area:
Comments supporting: | Responses |
Limitation | 118 |
Expansion | 41 |
Both | 12 |
Not provided/undetermined | 44 |
TOTAL | 215 |
When also considering whether there is a home or business interest in the
Agricultural Reserve, the responses were as follows:
Residence/Business | Expressed support for: |
Limitation | Expansion | Both | Undetermined | TOTAL |
In Ag Reserve | 37 | 37 | 4 | 27 | 105 |
Not in Ag Reserve | 80 | 1 | 8 | 16 | 105 |
Undetermined | 1 | 3 | - | 1 | 5 |
TOTAL | 118 | 41 | 12 | 44 | 215 |
The survey asked respondents to identify the most important issues and
problems to be addressed in the Agricultural Reserve, and potential
opportunities or solutions. Responses addressed a wide range of topics,
including many discussed at March 2014 Workshop of the Board of County
Commissioners. Topics addressed include:
- Existing and potential agricultural activities in the area, including
agri-tourism, marketing of local produce, organic or specialty crops, and
education
- Environmental resources including water resources and wildlife habitat
- Potential commercial and non-residential development
- Density and transferrable development rights
- Planned development size requirements
- Preserve area permissible uses
- Purchase of development rights or farmland, use of additional bond issue
Responses received to these questions can be viewed here:
PDF of responses.